Figure 1: Flow streamlines in a viscous fluid.
Now let's return to breakfast. I've got the honey on my spoon, and am fascinated by its slow-moving viscous behaviour. I lift the spoon high, and turn it upside down, watching for the honey to fall onto my toast. It takes a few seconds before it moves very much at all, but then it falls in a rush, as I now demonstrate.
Figure 2: Calculated shape of a drop of viscous fluid.Next I show a video of the same honey-falling flow. This video is not a close-up
of the actual demonstration, but is a computer simulation. It was prepared by my
PhD student
Yvonne Stokes,
using a `finite-element' program. This was actually
designed to be used with some industrial applications. Yvonne's main work is on the slumping of molten glass into a mould, which is
a very important process in the optical industry. Anyway, the computation is
clearly seen to be a very good model of actual flow of honey.
The final fall occurs
so rapidly that we need to split the screen; a compressed image allows more of the final fall to be seen. The previous picture shows a single frame from this video.
For the rest of this talk, I want to illustrate how very simple Year-12 level calculus can throw some light on this sudden-fall phenomenon. The next picture shows a snapshot of the honey-drop during its fall. I am going to be daring enough to ask you to appreciate some algebraic symbols, introducing the symbol to denote the length of the drop. Also I will use the symbol in the obvious way to denote the time. The question is, how does length vary with time ?
But in fact, the honey's fall is not exponential. The increase in length of the honey drop is initially slower but finally faster than exponential growth would suggest. In a certain approximation its growth is `explosive'. Explosive growth is where the rate of increase of is not just in proportion to the present length , but in proportion to the square of that length, as above.
Every Year-12 mathematics student can (or should be able to!) solve the differential equation for explosive growth. It is actually a bit easier than that for exponential growth. The answer is just that behaves like the reciprocal of a time difference. The most important consequence is that there is a finite time at which becomes infinite! This is the time when the explosion actually happens, or the time when the honey really falls. The previous picture shows a graph of against .
Even for exponential growth eventually becomes infinite, but only if you wait an infinite time. With explosive growth you don't have to wait an infinite time. The same practical qualification prevents an actual infinite value of from occurring; namely, the honey hits the toast.
(Photograph by Austin Post, USGS; reproduced from the collection of images available at the Cascades Volcano Observatory.)
(Photograph by Peter W Lipman, USGS; from the Cascades Volcano Observatory.)
The dome on Mt St Helens, was growing at up to 1.5m per day.
From the technical point of view, there is immense interest in the actual value of the explosion time . If was known for Mount St Helens, lives could have been saved. Indeed, the earthquake prediction business is precisely about this estimation. For the honey drop, we can predict quite well. For example, is proportional to the viscosity of the honey. Obviously thicker honey takes longer to fall.
This type of study is typical of Applied Mathematics.
Although the honey problem may seem rather trivial or silly,
I hope you can see the important practical generalisations,
some of which require only very elementary mathematics.